Awaiting reviewer response. " Required Reviews Complete: .
Awaiting reviewer response At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. For an article that is going through the double blind review, we estimate a period of three months for the reports to be sent to the author(s). Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. How to avoid a desk reject Choose the right journal Journal Recommender Get support with writing and formatting SAGE Author Services Carefully check the submissions guidelines on the journal’s homepage. Vicky Mountford-Brown mentioned that finding suitable peer reviewers is a difficult process, especially those who can understand and appreciate neurodivergent perspectives. Information for IJRR Reviewers. Is the right of review cancled because the too long response from the revoked reviewer? What will happen next? Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. This means that potential reviewers have been selected, but have yet to be invited. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. How long I should wait for the final verdict? Editor here. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. Still the status is same. The status of the paper was 'Submitted. 0 Kudos. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. You may also wish to comment on how well the authors addressed the concerns of the other previous reviewers as well, or if But this could be either the “response due date” or the “review due date Hi, In 3. A well-crafted "response to reviewers" document is a critical part of your response. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Awaiting Initial Reviewers Rejected at stage of awaiting reviewers to be assigned Awaiting Response. The interaction between the reviewer’s gender and the time period and topic was not significant (P=0. Submitted to Journal当上传结束后，显示的状态是Submitted to Journal，这个状态是自然形成的无需处理。2. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. Rejected. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. However, on the same day, the In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Patiently awaiting your response. What do I do at this point? Do I write an email to the editor? If you do not get a satisfactory response, pull it and Awaiting vs. Tips for Responding to Reviewers’ Comments (runtime: 12:18) The status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. This April, we received the reviewer's response and resubmitted after correction on May 18. Peer reviewers have been invited and asked to respond rapidly. This I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. But all of a what is the meaning of the status " awiting for reviewer responce meaning"? doe sit means that there is a reviewer who accepted to review or may be we just waitng responce ( to accept to review"??) what is the meaning of recieved responce (0/4)? Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. ) Personal Experience and Expertise. If a reviewer declines then the paper returns to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. g. If a manuscript is awaiting revision, you will be able to extend the due date using the “Due on:” box and clicking “Save. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. One reviewer have endorsed the publication, however, another reviewer showed "revoked" in the Frontier interactive review table. 1. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? 我在scholarone manuscript系统上投了一篇文章，awaiting RE assignment 3天后变成 awaiting reviewers' response，然后又过了9天左右，变成了awaiting reviewer scores，现在已经10天了，按照字面理解awaiting reviewers' response应该就是已经送外审了吧， The reasons can be several but they will mention them when they respond. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. For most manuscripts, in the A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Manuscripts quite often return to this stage if not enough Learn about the stages of peer review for your article submission to a BMJ journal. Reviewers' Comments to the Authors: Reviewer 1 I have send my research for possible publication; after 45 days the status changed from round one (a review is overdue) to round two (awaiting reviewer comments). The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. 问：论文小修后为什么会出现awaiting reviewer assignment不应该直接返回原来审稿人那边，然后原来审稿人审吗. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Dear Team; In OJS3. Setting 19 specialist medical journals and two large general medical journals from BMJ Publishing Group. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Harper. For instance, it works well when emailing clients. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. 1 conditionally accepted with mandatory major change (4 weeks) (Two reviewers, one of whom did not agree to accept the review, should be the reviewer of the If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. ” Invitation Response E-Mails: the automatic response e-mails following a reviewers invitation response. They assigned an AE. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ recommendations The editor makes the final decision, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations The editor notifies the author that their paper has been accepted The editor notifies the author that their paper In this case, our advice to this author, which was passed via the RCP, was to wait for 6-8 weeks to hear back from the journal (based on the average time to first response stated on the journal’s website) and then to write a politely-worded email to the editor to request more information, suggesting some additional names and emails for I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. Possibly to likely (the reviewers are still experts, they already know the paper (reduce work load). Then, the status remained unchanged for three weeks. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. After several days, it became "1 reviewer(s) accepted". Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. ” It has been almost 2 months now. Under review also can mean that the article is being considered by the science editor for technical and English language check or it is with the subject editor and he is evaluating it for external review, or the article is I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Editorassigned4 Negative Example: “You missed the last three meetings. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. 11. The editor made no effort to reconcile the contradictions between the two reviews (e. The latter is a clear term that The term "Awaiting Reviewer" means that the Editor has sent invitations to two or more reviewers for reviewing your manuscript but the Editor has still not received any I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under review to ensure that you have actually responded accordingly and adequately. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Reviewers should meet as many of the criteria below as possible: The reviewer’s field of study and emphasis is confirmed. Securing Research Funding. The primary goal of IJRR is to serve the robotics community by selecting, enhancing and publishing the top scientific and I submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. procession一般3－4天后就会安排主编。 2。awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit in someone's I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. The amount of time you will be given to make your revisions will reflect the extent of changes required. 2. So, please give me The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) means looking for suitable reviewers to invitate While the second process ( Awaiting Reviewer Assignmet) means suitable reviewers has been found Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 1 (also in the previous OJS3 versions), when any reviewer does not respond within the due date, the status message changes to “A review is overdue”. This message is visible to the author as well which should not. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. ” Additionally, we will provide valuable tips, examples, and even discuss regional variations when necessary. Cite The average review period of the target journal that I submitted is two weeks, and it usually takes about a month to get the first revision. Other time-efficient retrieval options. The fact that you are apparently seeing this status for more than a brief moment indicates that the journal is using Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. Back To Top. All page numbers refer to the revised manuscript file with tracked changes. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. 21 awaiting reviewer scores 2021. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. What does this mean? Will it go for review? "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. " Does this Reviewers’ response to invitations by geographical affiliation and gender during and before the pandemic. The e-mail might come embedded with hyperlink invitation responses. However, I definitely remember the last two: Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. We have incorporated most of the suggestions made by the reviewers. Please see below, in blue, for a point-by-point response to the reviewers’ comments and concerns. 画面下の「Change Manuscript I submitted the revised paper one month after receiving the comments. 9. But the editor, for some reason, e. Response to comment 3. Now, the status is Awaiting EIC Decision. Do not email to ask about 有作者咨询：论文状态awaiting reviewer assignment 的意思，这是初审环节的一个状态，代表等待分配审稿专家，在整个sci论文发表过程中，论文状态会有多个变化，具体说明如下： 1、编辑初审阶段会看到的状态 Manuscript Submitted/Manuscript received by Editorial Office——投稿已到杂志社 The reviewers response and your response ti their enquiry and how the editors get satisfied with the revised version finally determine the fate of your paper. Is this common in scientific journals? I submitted others manuscripts to other journals and the review process was different. 31 awaiting eic decision 2021. Those changes are highlighted within the manuscript. I Look Forward to Hearing Back. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. Awaiting reviewers scores simply mean the article is with the reviewers and the journal office is waiting for the comments. Witheditor如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。这当中就会有另两个状态：3. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Message 21 of 23. The status of the paper changed several times. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. " Required Reviews Complete: This indicates that the author has submitted the revised document (and a point-by-point response to the reviewer's comments, if required). As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Cite. Good luck. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still "awaiting reviewer invitation. Table of Contents. Awaiting your reply, Mr. 4e Awaiting publisher Last December, I submitted my paper to a Springer Nature journal. Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never respond to the invitation, and so on. Again, the Peer review process. x the filter option is very good and helpful. 3. What does this mean? Responding to Reviewer Comments; Journal Rejection; Journal Retraction; Career Growth. Can you please explain what it is going on? If they do not provide a satisfactory response or are likely to take longer with their decision, you may consider withdrawing the manuscript and submitting to But in the journal i submitted to, under review means AE is examining the paper as the first stage, while "awaiting reviewer scores" means it's actually out for review. Diterima dengan My paper underwent a revision. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. 2. Red = overdue - Red outline = recently overdue - Orange outline = will be overdue soon - Blue outline = waiting for the reviewer to accept or complete the review To help editors understand and learn Dr. 30 awaiting co-eic recommendation 2021. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. There is no set time for this to take. However, the editor can change the reviewers, in case one gave a bad review (in terms of quality). Women agreed to review less often than did men, with no difference across the time periods. 文章浏览阅读2. I checked the status now: Reviewer 1 has already finished review in the end of May, and reviewer 2 approved it in • Please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewers and add additional rows to the document as needed. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Click on “Take Action. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which The chapter provides an in-depth tutorial on responding to reviewer requests, prioritizing which requests to respond to first, how to respond to different editorial styles, and how to use the response letter to “push back” against reviewer requests without being combative. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. Awaiting Reviewer Reports - the paper has been sent to the reviewer(s) and we are awaiting their report. " Related reading: Why Awaiting Admin Processing: Your submission is waiting for initial review by the editorial office. The article may have been single or double anonymously peer reviewed before publication. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. If only one reviewer agrees to review and all the others What was the response for your manuscript. , by asking us to refute the critiques, by inviting an additional reviewer, or by evaluating I submitted a manuscript to Scientific Reports. Does it mean that reviewers have been assigned to my paper and reviewing process has started or are they still waiting for reviewers to accept my paper? I submitted my paper to a journal. We hope that this greater transparency will improve the quality of the review process, give more recognition to Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. You should include a point-by-point reply that addresses each suggestion when you submit the revised article. , "Awaiting AE decision". 4. 28 in review process 2021. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". We think other methods that improve retrieval time efficiency without 36 changing the prototype support are complementary to our approach; we aim to improve bothmemory and time efficiency 37 by reducing prototype size. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. If you would like to use the phrase “I await your response” or “awaiting your response” those are both fine as well. Dr. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. ' On May 21, our paper's status changed to 'Editorial assignment pending. Does it mean the work will be rejected? The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). A few days ago, the status was "reviewers invited". For guidance, use the Author Response to Reviewers Template. It shows that your brand or company is fun A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点： 1. This may involve checking that the submission is within the journal's scope and adheres to submission guidelines. We are still awaiting a response from the Microsoft exchange incident. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". Ditolak 2. I also noticed that A desk reject response in 2022 was sent on average within 13 days. Revise and respond to all editor and reviewer comments. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. Since the workflow was designed to show messages only to those participants who need to act, this message is I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. some reviewers agree to review, but don't submit their reports by the deadline (or tell the editor that they won't be able to complete the review after all. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". Responding to reviews UKRI and a number of other funders give Principal Investigators (PIs) the opportunity to respond to comments made by reviewers during the assessment process. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for 34 Response to Reviewer #4 35 Q1. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. The journal told me If reviewers from the previous round are not available (no response or decline to re-review), then it is the task of the editor to evaluate if the comments have been addressed satisfactorily. So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. 28 awaiting ae recommendation 2021. The two reviews were clearly contradictory on several points. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are Two months after submission I was asked to suggest possible reviewers, which I did after a couple of days reflection. Really, I didn’t understand how the journal can jump to the the second round review stage without sending me any comments from the first round to make the suggested corrections? 了解"awaiting reviewer scores"意味着什么及所需等待时间，首先需要理解这一阶段在SCI期刊出版流程中的位置。一般情况下，这一阶段需根据期刊的具体要求来判断，通常在1个月左右，但有时可能在15天内，或长达2个月。 2021. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Check their publication record; Check their institutional page for their specialities within a field of study and what they focus on; The reviewer is familiar with all aspects of the manuscript I submitted a paper to some journal. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. Selecting the appropriate hyperlink sends the response to the journal and updates the system with your response. I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. 10. As we mentioned in the response to Comment 2 from you, critical appraisal questions proposed by Tierney et al(2) have been added in our criteria for assessing the methodological quality of included IPD meta-analyses. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. It means reviewers have been invited but have not responded to the invitation. ” It’s a great phrase to include in a more light-hearted situation. It got past the editor phase and switched to 'Reviewer Assignment Pending', being stuck in that ever since I've contacted the journal twice and got the same response, that it is still awaiting reviewers and that I'll be notified once an update happens. 3 Thank you for your comments. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. So I just wonder why it was returned to the AE again – notfunnyatall. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting decision), after 2 Thank you for your question. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Vicky Mountford-Brown and Dr. A copy of your revised paper with the changes highlighted can also be very useful. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. In this section:. E-Mail Notifications and Reminders: contains all the reminders sent to editors and reviewers for tasks Motivation: After 27 weeks, we received a very positive review and a very negative one. After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. Peer review is the process used to assess whether an academic paper is suitable for publication based on the quality, originality and importance of the work. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to Awaiting Release from Hold Decision on proposal is postponed pending receipt of additional information from applicant. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Too frequently, authors focus on revising the manuscript itself and spend too little time making the response document clear and updated article, any supplementary information, and the authors’ response to reviewers to determine if all your concerns have been addressed and if you are satisfied with the updates. After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. procession一般3－4天后就会安排主编。 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿 The title says it all. Dear Dr. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? 去年11月，我在老师的建议下投了一篇TMECH的文章，中间经过漫长的审稿、拒稿/大修，改稿、润色，最后到今天把大修的论文 I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The status has been "Awaiting a reviewer reply" for about a month. This is particularly important in the current Article submitted后（即paper提交后）： 1、awaiting admin. Moreover, the negative one was full of factual errors. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. ” (Here, the phrase might come off as sarcastic or passive-aggressive. However, I submitted the paper at the end of May and the status is still “under review. The chapter also offers suggestions for handling conflicting We are still awaiting a response from several potential sources including the National Council of State Legislatures and the Department of Public Health and . 4w次，点赞4次，收藏26次。Elsevier 投稿各种状态总结1. The success of the response in addressing any concerns or questions raised by reviewers can be vital in In this comprehensive guide, we will explore various formal and informal ways to say “awaiting your response. without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Waiting for Your Reply. 2c Two or more peer Awaiting author/peer reviewer confirmation Query regarding revised manuscript, which has been received. RESPONDING TO AN INVITATION . e. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. The status has been "Awaiting a reviewer reply" for about a month. The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). 11; supplementary table E). 4,663 Views. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. Or, the reviewers' reports come in and they are conflicting, so the editor wants more reviews to help him/her make a decision. It seems to me that the processing at all levels Our journals depend on our bank of reviewers to assess the quality and usefulness of the 47,000 manuscripts we receive each year. Next, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation and remained so for a week. If the previous editorial decision was B (minor revisions), only the editor will see the author responses and will make a decision based on them. Back in July, I submitted a paper for Springer's Machine Learning. Kelly Forbes-Simpson discussed how feedback from peer reviewers can sometimes be brutal and discouraging, particularly for early career I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again In December 2020, I submitted a paper to Frontiers. The reviewer’s comments, author responses and editorial decision letters are published alongside the final published article, in citable form. Generally, 2-3 peer reviewers are assigned to a paper. ' Is it under review again or has the editor not seen my paper? Could you please clarify? I submitted my paper to one of the IEEE Transactions journals. This is most commonly known as the ‘Response to reviewers’. This document is submitted alongside your revised manuscript, summarizing the changes that you made in response to the critiques. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. This may, however, vary across journals. Rejected at stage of waiting to go to meeting Awaiting I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Objectives To describe gender and geographical inequalities in invitations to review and the response to these invitations and to assess whether inequalities increased during the covid-19 pandemic. Thank you very much for accepting to be a part of the IJRR peer review process! (To volunteer to be a reviewer, please contact directly an Associate Editor in the Editorial Board who is in your area of expertise. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. The status has been the same for a few days. ) Then the editor tries to find additional reviewers. Reviewers are asked to provide a report within 14 days for Letters After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. Popular answers (1) Oluwadara Pelumi Omotayo. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. (3) Should I attach a response document for reviewers' comments? I found no exact place for a response document in the submission system. Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point-by-point response to the reviewer's comments with their revised I submitted my manuscript to a journal. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. Rejected at stage of awaiting PI response Awaiting Meeting. In my professional experience, I’ve used “Patiently awaiting your response” in emails to show anticipation and respect. Is this normal or should I be worried? When submitting your revised paper, you should also send in a detailed list of changes and reply to each referee. 2b First peer reviewer allocated The first peer reviewer has accepted to conduct a review of the paper. Find out what happens when your article is awaiting reviewer response and how long it takes to get a decision. Reviewers Invited - one or more reviewers have been invited and we are awaiting their response. Now it is almost 3 weeks. • When referring to specific text in your manuscript using the below table, please include the original sentence and the revised sentence so that the changes are clear for the reviewers, including the line number. It's not necessarily the same as 'under review' and 'awaiting reviewer scores'. If you want to remain polite and friendly, stick with something familiar like “I look forward to hearing back. When the paper was sent to reviewers, they reviewed within one month. It has been almost two weeks without any The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Again this time, no reviewer was assigned for 2 months. It took 10 days to go from Under Review to Awaiting Reviewer Scores. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. If you select the Agreed I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. " I sent an email to the editor-in-chief as this was the only contact information given for queries. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Please revise your paper to respond to all of the comments by The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Design Retrospective cohort study. The correct response is “waiting for your reply” because of the inserted preposition. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Funding Sources; Grant Application; Science Communication. However, I just noticed that the status of my Clarivate Analytics | ScholarOne Manuscripts™ Reviewer User Guide Page 2 . The document is now awaiting a check by the journal's editorial office. Using the menu to the left find out more about the peer review process, how to review and how to become a reviewer for BMJ. Population Reviewers The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Be the first to reply. " After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". ). I am really Reviewer--审稿人。（Article要求两个审稿人＋AE，总共三个人审。communication只有一个人审，这个人或者是编辑部指定的审稿人，或者是AE） Article submitted后 1。awaiting admin. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. So, even after one reviewer submits his report, the immediate change in status would be a reflection of that action, i. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating Hi. . Commented Mar 14, 2022 at 2:51. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. reviewers. Revision deadlines will vary between publishers. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. Server for them to correct this. toqs lmsb zvfdpje fxocnn ucqa wdvsew jgcp trwkjl copa xwkcmtir